February 23, 2010

Sinfulness of sin - Venning - VII - Section 3 continued

Required reading
Sinfulness of sin by Ralph Venning (available from Amazon or free on the internet, here for example).  Continue reading Section 3 by reading Points 4, 5 and 6.

My summary
Venning continues his section on the witnesses against sin by looking at the witness of creation, the law and the gospel.

Creation witnesses against sin by:
(i) the fact that sin has injured creation;
(ii) teaching man about his sin;
(iii) punishing sinners.

The law witnesses against sin both before sin is committed and after it is committed.

The gospel witnesses against sin through its doctrinal, mandatory, promising, menacing, exemplary and experimental parts.

What grabbed me
I liked the point that creatures shame man for being lazy: 'Man was not to be idle in paradise, and every man should have a calling to follow and should follow his calling. The apostle says, he that will not labour must not eat. From idleness comes no good, yet alas how many busy-bodies there are who do nothing but idle away their days! To these the creatures speak by their industry, and Solomon refers the sluggard to the ant to learn (Proverbs 6.6-11). It is not only, Go to the infidel (for he that provides not for his family is worse than an infidel); but it is, Go to the ant. Perhaps your wife and children lack certain conveniences, even necessities, while you are idle. Go to the ant, thou sluggard!'

Because of sin dumb animals are more industrious than man who has been granted greater wisdom.  We must do everything we can to redeem time from sin's clutches!

(Did I find a typo today in one of Venning's headings? Venning says '2. The law takes occasion by the commandment to deceive us.  The Apostle says that it did so to him (Romans 7.11).'  But Paul says sin deceived him and the rest of the headings in the section begin with a 'Sin...'.  Is it a typo or can the law deceive us?)

Next week's reading
Finish reading Section 3 by reading Point 7.

Now it's your turn
Please post your own notes and thoughts in the comments section below.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Surely, he must have meant that sin deceives us into thinking that the commandments mean something entirely other than they do, just as Satan tempted Eve (which is the illustration he uses).

My understanding is that the law is holy and perfect, and that only our own defectiveness in sin misinterprets it.

By the way, thank you so much for your work on the reading schedules and reading choices. I've been most edified with reading these great works, and appreciate very much your succinct and insightful comments.

Joel Radford said...

Thanks for your encouragements whoever you may be.

I agree with what you say about the law. I was just a bit surprised that if it is a typo it hasn't been corrected or at least questioned with a footnote from the publisher as Banner of Truth sometimes does. Surely we're not the first to notice it in 300 years...