Holiness by J C Ryle (available from Amazon or free on the internet, here for example)
1) Is it wise to speak of faith as the only thing required in handling sanctification?
2) Is it wise to make so little of the many practical exhortations in scripture to holiness in daily life?
3) Is it wise to use vague language about perfection which presses Christians to attain a standard of holiness in this life where they claim they no longer sin?
4) Is it wise to believe Romans 7 speaks of the unregenerate?
5) Is it wise to use the doctrine that 'Christ is in us' at the expense of the Holy Spirit's role?
6) Is it wise to believe there are three divisions in mankind: (i) unconverted; (ii) converted; and (iii) partakers of the higher life?
7) Is it wise to tell people to not struggle against sin but simply take a passive role of 'yielding to God'?
To all the questions Ryle answers no, it is not wise.
Doctrine is important. If anyone knows this, it is Satan. Hopefully reading this book together in the club we will be able to promote a right understanding of holiness together and inflict serious harm on Satan's kingdom.
Now it's your turn
Please post your own notes and thoughts in the comments section below.
4 comments:
First off, thank you for this selection. I just finished reading "Christless Christianity" by Michael Horton, and this is much needed to follow that.
I didn't get to read the preface as the online link doesn't provide it, but very much loved the introduction. I love men who are very clear in their writing and I can say after reading the introduction that Ryle is one of them.
The question that interested me the most was about Romans 7. I read a blog which sided with the opposing side of Ryle's not too long ago, and I was interested to read more on it. Right now, I agree with Ryle because the other side's argument doesn't make sense to me. Why would Paul go through all of Romans up till then and go back to writing about his unconverted state? It just doesn't seem like it would fit there.
Sorry, tried to find a copy of the preface on the web for you, but only could find fragments of it.
One of my primary problems with understanding that Romans 7 is about the unregenerate is Romans 8:7: 'the sinful mind is hostile to God. It does not submit to God's law, nor can it do so.' (Rom 8:7 NIV)
If the unbeliever is hostile toward God how can he hate what he does - he loves his sin.
From Margo (via Tom's email address)
Was first given 'Holiness' in 1985; so, it's a pleasure to come back to it. What I really liked in the introduction:
(1st paragraph) It is a cause which everyone who loves Christ, and desires to advance His kingdom in the world, should endeavour to help forward. Everyone can do something.
I like this because all Christians can do this.
I also liked (in the 4th point):
Truth needs no such weapons. If we cannot agree with men, we need not speak of their views with discourtesy and contempt.
This is like Francis Schaeffer, who always treated people with respect, no matter what they thought, which, to me is true holiness
I was blessed by Ryle's explanations of the distinctions between justification and sanctification. Justification is the work that only CHrist can do and we "rest" in it, but in sanctification there is some "striving" on our parts. Also I enjoyed his explanation of Christians who think they can go for a time without sinning as if they have arrived. To hear great men of God such as Ryle humbly advise that they are nowhere near attaining perfection, humbles me and gives me perspective on how filthy my own righteousness truly is.
Post a Comment